8/6/09 12:48 pm - The End of Free News?
Saw this article, news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8186701.stm, on the BBC website regarding Rupert Murdoch planning to charge for the news content on the News Corp. websites (Fox News, NY Post, etc.). My favorite quote from the article is when Murdoch said, "Quality journalism is not cheap, and an industry that gives away its content is simply cannibalizing its ability to produce good reporting.” Of course some people would say that many of Murdoch’s holdings are one step above the National Enquirer in terms of journalistic excellence, haha, with the Wall Street Journal being one of his few respectable holdings. I don't know how people would react to having to pay for content that they were used to getting for free.
People will pay for good journalism, when I worked at Books a Million in Rock Hill, I remember people paying $5.00 for a copy of the Sunday edition of the NY Times. The Wall Street Journal may succeed with this model as it is a niche publication, but I cant see people paying 5 cents to read the latest rant from Glenn Beck on foxnews.com or which NY socialite is breaking up with their boytoy on the NY Post webpage. The news industry needs help, but I am not sure this microbilling for each story is the panacea to their ills. I think we need good high-quality journalism again. A large percentage of the stories in the Indianapolis Star are a regurgitation of things from the AP wire.
I don't know how I feel about paying for online content. I wish the daily paper would become strong again, I would rather read the paper than an article online, I guess I am a luddite when it comes to how I like to read my news. I think regardless of the medium I would pay for high-quality journalism.
In terms of major papers, I really enjoy the NY Times and the few times I have read the Washington Post I thought it was a very good news paper. I miss actually reading news I am tired of the political pandering news oultlets on both sides of the political spectrum put forward as news. I enjoy Keith Olbermann's show, but I look at it more as entertainment with some news mixed in. In terms of news on the radio I like NPR and I like the local news radio station,(i.e., all news, very little talk) .
There is some evidence that the news industry hasn't completely lost its journalistic soul, just this morning the Indianapolis Star had an article that they were investigating whether a local City's redevelopment group (a quasi-governmental group), that is tasked with handling a 80 to 100 million dollar redevelopment of their downtown had to comply with the state's public notice and sunshine laws. I saw bravo to the Indianapolis Star for actually investigating something, not reprinting a press release or offering up an opinion as journalism, but actually doing research and comparing the facts with the laws. Maybe there is some hope for journalism. :)
People will pay for good journalism, when I worked at Books a Million in Rock Hill, I remember people paying $5.00 for a copy of the Sunday edition of the NY Times. The Wall Street Journal may succeed with this model as it is a niche publication, but I cant see people paying 5 cents to read the latest rant from Glenn Beck on foxnews.com or which NY socialite is breaking up with their boytoy on the NY Post webpage. The news industry needs help, but I am not sure this microbilling for each story is the panacea to their ills. I think we need good high-quality journalism again. A large percentage of the stories in the Indianapolis Star are a regurgitation of things from the AP wire.
I don't know how I feel about paying for online content. I wish the daily paper would become strong again, I would rather read the paper than an article online, I guess I am a luddite when it comes to how I like to read my news. I think regardless of the medium I would pay for high-quality journalism.
In terms of major papers, I really enjoy the NY Times and the few times I have read the Washington Post I thought it was a very good news paper. I miss actually reading news I am tired of the political pandering news oultlets on both sides of the political spectrum put forward as news. I enjoy Keith Olbermann's show, but I look at it more as entertainment with some news mixed in. In terms of news on the radio I like NPR and I like the local news radio station,(i.e., all news, very little talk) .
There is some evidence that the news industry hasn't completely lost its journalistic soul, just this morning the Indianapolis Star had an article that they were investigating whether a local City's redevelopment group (a quasi-governmental group), that is tasked with handling a 80 to 100 million dollar redevelopment of their downtown had to comply with the state's public notice and sunshine laws. I saw bravo to the Indianapolis Star for actually investigating something, not reprinting a press release or offering up an opinion as journalism, but actually doing research and comparing the facts with the laws. Maybe there is some hope for journalism. :)
contemplative
happy and thoughtful
crushed and numb
and hopeful
ecstatic
awake


